Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1925No. 24,888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, O. J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff for the benefit of his minor son to recover damages for personal injuries to the son. Defendant O. W. Roome answered. Defendant railway company demurred upon the ground that the facts stated in the complaint were not sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court overruled the demurrer, but certified that the question presented by the demurrer was important and doubtful. The railway company appealed.

The complaint' alleges the status of the parties. That defendants were engaged in drilling a well on the premises of the railroad…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kefee v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. O'Malley v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bass v. Quinn-Robbins Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Carlson v. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Powell v. LigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Stadtherr v. City of Sauk CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API