Craver v. Christian
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Hennepin county, to recover damages for injuries received while working in defendants’ flouring-mill, under the circumstances detailed in the opinion. The action was tried before Lochren, J., and the plaintiff had a verdict. A new trial was refused, and the defendants appealed. A former appeal in the action is reported, 34 Minn. 397.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The principles involved in the cases of Sherman v. Chicago, Mil. & St. Paul Ry. Co., 34 Minn. 259, (25 N. W. Rep. 593;) Craver v. Christian, 34 Minn. 397, (26 N. W. Rep. 8;) and Barbo v. Bassett, 35 Minn. 485, (29 N. W. Rep. 198;)—and which were considered by this court in the determination thereof,— will necessarily lead to an affirmance of the order refusing a new trial in this ease.
It will be seen that the liability of the defendants in these eases is not rested, solely upon the ground that the machinery or instrumentalities provided were not fenced or covered, but rather upon the *414ground…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Massoth v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Russell v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Craver v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Anderson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Wilson v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Wiita v. Interstate Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Carroll v. WillistonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Seininski v. Wilmington Leather Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.