Legal Opinion

Stanhope v. Lawrence

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1990No. 88-616PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This appeal involves causes of action that arose within the context of a closely-held corporation and alleged several claims including breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, conversion and bad faith. Plaintiff Ronald L. Stan-hope appeals the order of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, granting the individual defendants’, John D. Lawrence, Jr., H. Richard Hansen, Lamonte W. Wagner, and Hansen-Lawrence Agency, Inc., and the separate defendant Farmer’s State Bank of Worden, motion for new trial. We affirm.

Among the issues raised by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Olson v. Westfork Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bracy v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Haynes v. County of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Tope v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Zeke's Distributing Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Whiting v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Baird v. Norwest BankMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fjelstad v. State, Through Dept. of HighwaysMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Henrichs v. ToddMontana Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API