Legal Opinion

Zeke's Distributing Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1989No. 88-532PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This appeal involves a motion for new trial in an action for breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff Zeke’s Distributing Company (Zeke’s) appeals the ruling of the District Court of the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County, granting defendant Brown-Forman Corporation’s (BrownForman) motion for new trial. The District Court granted the motion on the grounds that the court erred in receiving over BrownForman’s proper objection certain exhibits and testimony prejudicial to Brown-Forman’s case. We affirm,

Plaintiff Zeke’s frames two issues…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. United Pacific InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Bank of Townsend v. Maryann's, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Tope v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Giles v. Flint Valley Forest ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Thiel v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Krueger v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Whiting v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hunt v. K-Mart Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re the Marriage of LopezMontana Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API