Legal Opinion

Baird v. Norwest Bank

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1992No. 91-224PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

Plaintiffs, Thomas and Denise Baird, brought this action to recover damages from Norwest Bank for accelerating payment and repossessing their truck and van upon a default under an installment note. The complaint sought damages based on breach of contract; breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; breach of the Montana Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act; fraud; and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The jury returned a verdict for the Bairds and awarded them $5,200 for violation of the Montana Consumer Protection Act; $6,600 for breach of contract…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Safeco Insurance v. EllinghouseMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Barrett v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Christensen v. BrittonMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Batten v. Watts Cycle and Marine, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Stafford v. Cross Country BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  4. Morrow v. Bank of America, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. C. Haydon Ltd. v. Montana Mining Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API