Legal Opinion
City of Yakima v. Mollett
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 13, 2003No. 20548-7-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 P.3d 177 (2003)
115 Wash.App. 604
CITY OF YAKIMA, Respondent,
v.
Glenn James MOLLETT, Petitioner.
No. 20548-7-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.
February 13, 2003.
John A. Maxwell, Meyer, Fluegge & Tenney, Yakima, John D. Winfrey, III, Seattle, for Appellant.
Jeffrey R. Cutter, Assistant City Attorney, Legal Department, Yakima, for Respondent.
BROWN, C.J.
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution partly provides a criminal defendant "shall be bailable by sufficient sureties." The City of Yakima charged Glenn Mollett with telephone harassment. After he failed to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.