Legal Opinion

People v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1956No. Civ. 21974PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to direct and compel the respondent, the Municipal Court of Oxnard-Port iiueneme Judicial District, Ventura County, to:

“1. Direct the Chief of Police at the police department in the City of Oxnard, State of California, to take and preserve the fingerprints of defendant Albino Bamos Lozano.
“2. Require that the defendant report either to the court or to the probation officer at such times during the period of probation as specified by the court.

1 ‘ 3. Furnish defendant with probation papers stating:

“a. the length of probation.
“b. the terms and conditions…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In re LeviCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. BaumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Cole v. Antelope Valley Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API