Brietengross v. Theodore Krumm, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BARNARD, P. J.. This is an action to recover the agreed selling price of certain oranges, and certain commissions in connection with the sale of other oranges.
On December 9, 1936, a written contract was entered into between the plaintiff as “Seller” and the defendant as “Buyer”, which provided that the “Seller has sold and the Buyer has bought the entire crop of merchantable” oranges then growing on a described grove, at $1.50 per cwt. It was agreed that the picking and hauling were to be done at the expense of the buyer at the time and in the manner directed by it, receipt of a part of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Lassing v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Walti v. GabaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- MacRae v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Bill v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. BesoyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Post v. JacobsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- In Re Amica, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Peters v. MacChiaroliArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Matmor Olive Co. v. Du BoisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.