Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Baer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1984No. OSB 82-38; SC S30593PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar instituted disciplinary proceedings against the accused, Peter E. Baer, charging him with violations of the disciplinary rules in his dealings with Mr. and Mrs. Larry G. Peterson. A hearing was held before the Trial Board and the accused was found guilty of violating Disciplinary Rules 5-101(A) (refusing employment when the interests of the lawyer may impair his independent professional judgment); 5-104(A) (limiting business relations with a client); and 5-105(A)-(C) (refusing to accept or continue employment if the interest of another client may impair the independent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JansOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Complaint to the HershbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of WittemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of O'ByrneOregon Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API