Legal Opinion

Cutchin v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 31, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1814PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge

On November 19, 2013, Demanne Cutch-in (“the petitioner”) filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and on January 28, 2014, the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) filed its response. For the reasons discussed below, the petition will be denied. 1

I. BACKGROUND

The petitioner challenges the calculation of his sentence. See Petition (“Pet.”) ¶ 5. He contends that because he has not received proper credit toward service of his sentences, he should have been released from custody in April…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Ramsey v. FaustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Lorando v. WaldrenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Washington v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Battle v. CiolliDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  2. Cutchin v. Sentence Computation CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API