Legal Opinion
Veal v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided September 27, 2000No. 09-99-514 CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD L. WALKER, Chief Justice.
Following the unsuccessful attempt at suppressing the contraband made the basis of the instant prosecution, appellant pleaded guilty to the felony offense of Possession of Marijuana and was sentenced by the trial court to confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for a term of seven (7) years. As appellant conditioned his plea of guilty on the trial court’s denial of appellant’s pre-trial motion to suppress, we have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. See Young v. State, 8 S.W.3d 656, 663…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Haas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Davy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Parker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
- Nuttall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.