Legal Opinion

Nuttall v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 11, 2002No. 07-01-0250-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Wade Lee Nuttall (appellant) appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Via three issues, he contends the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion to suppress because: 1) he did not give consent to search his person; 2) the search did not qualify as a pat-down; and, 3) he was unlawfully detained. We affirm.

Standard of Review

The applicable standard of review is well settled and need not be reiterated. Instead, we cite the parties to Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 327 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) for an explanation of same.

Background

Viewing the evidence in a light most…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Powell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. McVickers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996
  5. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Strauss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  2. Brandon W. Stafford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012
  3. Craigh Sweeney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  4. Daniel Ores Pulver v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Greg Ferm v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API