Legal Opinion
In Re Widener's Estate
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1925No. 15131PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Respondents have assigned six grounds of error in the petition in error, but in the view taken of the ease here it will only be necessary to consider the sixth assignment, which is that the trial court erred in overruling the motion of respondents for a new trial. The twelfth ground of the motion for new trial reads:
‘‘The judgment of the court herein is contrary to law.”
Administration proceedings were pending in the county court of Pawnee county upon the estate of James Widener, deceased, of which George W. Reynolds was administrator. In that proceeding, and on July 23,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Haynes, Admx. v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- City Nat. Bank v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Runyan v. City of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Byrd v. MarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- United Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Harrell v. LondonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hugh Breeding, Inc. v. GodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.