United Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an appeal by defendants J. H. Hood and United Federal Savings & Loan Association of Tulsa from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county entered against them.
For a better understanding of the issues here presented, we deem it necessary to relate some of the imoceedings had in a former litigation upon which this action is based.
At an administrator’s sale, in the estate of Emma Works, deceased, in the county court of Tulsa county, defendant Hood purchased lot 6, block 15, Greenwood addition to the city of Tulsa, and lot 26, block 7, Rosednle addition to the,city of Tulsa. Hood…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Assessment of First National Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Katter v. RodgersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Watson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- In Re Widener's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Reuck v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. PelkofskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Dickerson v. FearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Booker v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Booker v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989