Driscoll v. Batchelor's Bottling Works, Inc.
Superior Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtFrost, J.
Heard on defendant’s motion for new trial after verdict for plaintiff for $4,700.
The grounds of defendant’s motion are as follows:
“First: Because the verdict was against the evidence and the weight thereof..Second: Because the verdict was against the law and the evidence and the weight thereof.
Third: Because the verdict does not do substantial justice between the parties.
Fourth: Because the defendant has discovered new and material evidence which was not reasonably available at the time of trial.”
On the 31st of August, 1929, plaintiff, a widow, '48 years of age, was riding on the right hand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reynolds v. Iowa & Nebraska InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- McCloskey v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Mobile Drug Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- DuBrutz v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Duffy v. RadkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.