Legal Opinion

Walpole's Administrator v. Carlisle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The appellee sued the appellant in the court below for negligence and misconduct of the defendant’s intestate, as an attorney and counselor at law, in the management of an action in the Marion Circuit Court on a replevin bond, wherein the appellee was the plaintiff, and Orrick, Geisendorff, Hanway, Parker, and Howard were the defendants. The plaintiff, in his complaint, averred, that after suit was commenced Walpole carelessly lost the bond which had been placed in his possession; that, some two years after the commencement of the action, he suffered a nonsuit without the knowledge or consent…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foulks v. FallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Kelso v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Nickless v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Long v. StrausIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Nickless v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API