Legal Opinion

State v. Picheco

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 2, 1964No. File No. CR 3-2755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.

In a trial to the court the defendant was convicted, in four counts, of violating the Sunday laws, § 53-300 of the General Statutes, by keeping open a shop on four successive Sundays. He has appealed in respect to the second, third and fourth counts. He asks us to reverse the judgment as to these three counts because he was denied a continuance and was not given an opportunity to consult with counsel and because the court erred in its conclusions based on the subordinate facts and in its conclusion on all the evidence that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

*585The defendant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. State v. PincusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Charleston Oil Co. v. Poulnot, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  5. Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bourgeois v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. State v. ChildersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. Gorra Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  4. State v. ZwerdlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API