Legal Opinion
State v. Gorra Bros.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 16, 1967No. File No. CR 10-22321PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
The defendant was prosecuted on a single count of working and making sales of agricultural products on Sunday, August 14,1966, in violation of § 53-300 of the General Statutes, and has appealed. The portions of the statute, which is a lengthy one, relied on by the state in proof of its case read as follows: “Work and recreation on Sunday. Any person who does, or requires an employee to do, any secular business or labor, except works of necessity or mercy, or, unless required by necessity or mercy, keeps open any shop, [or] warehouse ... or sells or exposes for sale any goods, wares or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- State v. HurlimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Bradbury v. City of South NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
- State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- State v. WeisserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. WeisserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986