State v. Zwerdling
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiCenzo, J.
The defendant was presented on three informations, each specifying a violation on a *34different Sunday. The three cases were tried together. Except for the three separate Sunday dates, as specified in the informations, the judgments, appeals, findings, and assignments of error are identical in all three cases. The appellant filed one brief for all three cases, and the appeals were argued as one case. The decision in the first case will control and dispose of the other two cases.
The finding in the first case establishes the following facts. The defendant was an employee and working as a salesman…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HurlimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- State v. ShusterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Wight v. GeerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1792
- Nygren v. PotocekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- State v. PichecoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Gorra Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1967