Legal Opinion
L & H TRANSPORT, INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 1985No. C6-85-104PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
L & H Transport, Inc. (“L & H”) appeals from the trial court’s orders dismissing its action against the Drew Agency and granting summary judgment to the defendant in its action against Chubb and Sons (“Chubb”). We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
L & H arranged with its general insurance agent, the Drew Agency, to procure a policy of cargo insurance which would in- elude insurance against the cost of cleanup in the event of any accident. Drew Agency procured such a policy from Chubb and Sons, insurers. The policy which Chubb issued contained a one year…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. PushorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Terrell v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Sullivan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- L & H TRANSP., INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Brick Church Transmission, Inc. v. Southern Pilot Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. North Lakes Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Noon Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Dairyland Insurance Co. v. ClementsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.