Legal Opinion
Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1984No. C5-83-2051PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal by appellant Federal Insurance Company (Federal) from a judgment entered against Federal and Consolidated Rail Corp. (Conrail) as a result of a property damage loss by respondent Lor-am. The action was tried to the court pursuant to a stipulation of facts and documents. Federal appeals, contending that the trial court erred in holding Federal liable on its insurance policy. Conrail did not file a notice of appeal. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Loram leased a ballast cleaner to respondent Conrail. During the lease period in August 1978 while operating on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Nordby v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Farrell v. Nebraska Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Prior Lake State Bank v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- L & H TRANSP., INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Brick Church Transmission, Inc. v. Southern Pilot Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- L & H TRANSPORT, INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.