Legal Opinion
Domen Holding Co. v. Aranovich
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 2003PublishedCited by 53 opinions
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CIPARICK, J.
Plaintiff, Domen Holding Co., is the owner and landlord of a residential building in Manhattan. Pursuant to a written apartment lease dated August 26, 1991 and subsequent renewal, defendants Irene S. Aranovich and her brother Jorge Aranovich are named tenants of a rent-stabilized apartment in that building. Mr. Aranovich no longer lives in the apartment. However, at some point during the tenancy, defendant Geoffrey Warren Sanders moved in with Ms. Aranovich. Since at least 1995, the landlord has received a number of complaints stemming from incidents involving…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho LamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Nussbaum v. LacopoNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Frank v. Park Summit Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Frank v. Park Summit Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Domen Holding Co. v. AranovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by53 opinions
- Berenger v. 261 West LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Reade v. Reva Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Chelsea 18 Partners, LP v. Sheck Yee MakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Harris v. MirandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Stanley v. Amalithone Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.