Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Stewart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 23, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mazzakelli, J.P.
On this appeal we must determine whether Rent Stabilization Code (RSC) (9 NYCRR) § 2524.2 (b) requires an owner who seeks to occupy an apartment for his own use, pursuant to RSC § 2524.4 (a), to state the facts underlying his decision in the nonrenewal notice.
Appellant landlord is the owner of the building known as 459 West 43rd Street. Respondent has been a rent-stabilized tenant in apartment 1A in the building for nearly 30 years. In July 2005, the landlord served a notice on the tenant advising her as follows:
“PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that your lease . . .…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pultz v. EconomakisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Festa v. LeshenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. CamlakidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Horsford v. BacottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Giancola v. MiddletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Rudd v. SharffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010
- Matter of People of the State of New York v. Northern Leasing Sys., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Rudd v. SharffCivil Court of the City of New York · 2010
- Sung Yoon Kim v. HettingerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018