Legal Opinion

Hayashida v. Second Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1960No. 4325PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*434OPINION

By the Court,

McNamee, C. J.:

This is an original proceeding wherein petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent court from continuing with a tort action against him on the ground that it has no jurisdiction over petitioner.

One Claud Head sustained personal injuries when a truck and trailer, owned by petitioner, was being unloaded at a job site where the truck had parked a half mile from Nevada State Highway Route 27. At the time of the accident the engine was stopped and the driver was out of the vehicle. The said tort action was commenced by Head who alleged therein…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Brauer MacHine & Supply Co. Ex Rel. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Parkhill Truck Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ellis v. Georgia Marble Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. O'SULLIVAN v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  5. McDonald v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Langness v. Fernstrom Storage & Van Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1966
  2. Ali v. Loya Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API