Legal Opinion
Langness v. Fernstrom Storage & Van Co.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided April 26, 1966No. Civ. No. 4196PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
REGISTER, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Defendant’s counsel has served and filed a Motion to Dismiss, premised on the grounds that (a) the Court lacks jurisdiction over *880the Defendants, (b) there has been insufficiency of process, and (c) there has been insufficiency of service of process, The matter has been fully briefed and is submitted without oral argument, by virtue of the provisions of Rule V of the rules of this Court.
This is a personal injury action wherein the Plaintiff alleges that he is a citizen of the State of North Dakota and that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Muriel Jeanne Homolla v. Shirley C. GluckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Brauer MacHine & Supply Co. Ex Rel. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Parkhill Truck Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Klein v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. GibbonsDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1972