Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Mothers Work, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 7, 2006No. 23139-9-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*529¶1

Sweeney, A.C.J.

— Employees of Mothers Work, Inc., prevailed in an action for back pay under the Washington Minimum Wage Act, chapter 49.46 RCW. Mothers Work assigns error to the trial court’s award of attorney fees and costs. Mothers Work argues first that the employees should not have recovered any attorney fees because the jury awarded them less than the amount of Mothers Work’s settlement offer. But we conclude that prejudgment interest is added to the amount of the jury verdict in determining the amount of recovery. This brings the total recovery above the offer. Next, Mothers Work…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Smith v. Diffee Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Polygon Northwest Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Stevens v. Brink's Home Security, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Stevens v. Brink's Home Security, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Williams v. TilayeWashington Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API