Legal Opinion
Berkeley Federal Bank & Trust, FSB v. Ogalin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 17, 1998No. AC 17206PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*206 Opinion
LAVERY, J.
This is an appeal by the named defendant et al.1 from a judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court following its acceptance of an attorney trial referee’s report. On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly accepted the attorney trial referee’s report because (1) the referee improperly admitted hearsay evidence on the value of the mortgage debt, and (2) the plaintiffs notice of default was defective. We reverse the judgment of the trial court only as to the calculation of the late charges.
The attorney trial referee found the following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Michael Rizzo and Louise Rizzo v. Pierce & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- McKeever v. FioreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.