Painesville National Bank v. Hannan
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
This suit is to recover damages on account of the sale by Nisbet, as sheriff, of an automobile and equipment pursuant to a levy of a writ of attachment issued in a suit wherein Hannan, the other defendant herein, was plaintiff, against The Vulcan Manufacturing Oompány, of Ohio. At the conclusion of testimony of plaintiff, defendants moved a non-suit. The motion was allowed and the cause dis*302missed. Plaintiff brings the proceedings here for review on error. In the opinion the parties will be designated as in the trial court.
The essential facts are that Hannan, a dealer in automobiles in Denver,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Means v. Bank of RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- First National Bank v. Mount Pleasant Milling Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Merchants' Exch. Bank of Milwaukee v. McGrawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
- Hamill v. HallColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Union National Bank v. Maines-Hough Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- First National Bank v. HamerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926