Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Hamer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 26, 1926No. 11,536Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Plaintiee in error intervened in an attachment suit by Hamer against the Southwestern Grain Company, was defeated, brings error, moves for supersedeas and asks for final judgment on the motion. There is no appearance for defendant in error.

The intervener advanced money to the grain company on bills of lading for hay shipped from Mosca, Colorado, to Port Worth, Texas. After the bills were delivered to the American National Bank, Alamosa, Colo., agent of the intervener bank, Hamer attached the hay. The court held that it was the hay of the grain company and that Hamer’s rights were superior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Means v. Bank of RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Davis v. Fruita Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Florence & Cripple Creek Railroad v. JensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Merchants' Exch. Bank v. McGrawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
  5. Painesville National Bank v. HannanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API