Means v. Bank of Randall
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE KANSAS. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr.. Justice Blatoheord
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action brotight in the district court for the county of Cloud, in the State of Kansas, by the Bank of Bandall, a Kansas corporation, doing business at Bandall, in that State, against C. Gr. Means, "W. W. Means, and C. H. Means, copartners as C. Gv Means & Sons, to recover $6700, $4 protest fees, and $402 damages. The suit was accompanied by an attachment, and, before answer, was removed by the defendants, who were citizens of Missouri, into the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
The amended…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Gibson v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- First National Bank of Green Bay v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
3Cited by41 opinions
- Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bush v. Export Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1904
- Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe-Deposit Co. v. Roanoke Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1896
- Hercules Powder Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Millhiser Manufacturing Co. v. Gallego Mills Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.