Legal Opinion

Union National Bank v. Maines-Hough Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 4, 1921No. 9745PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Proceedings in garnishment. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Clarence J. Morley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This cause is here on writ of error to review a judgment of the District Court, wherein The Colorado State & Savings Bank, of Denver, as garnishee, is required to pay-over to The Maines-Hough Motor Company $2,900.00, money which The Union National Bank of Fostoria, Ohio, claims. The parties are here designated as in the court below.

The Allen Motor Company, of Fostoria, Ohio, the principal defendant, drew two drafts upon The Miller-Ray Motor Company, of Denver, in payment for automobiles which it had sold to the latter company. The drafts were for $4,586.30 and $4,949.12, respectively, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taft v. Quinsigamond National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Heinrich v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Painesville National Bank v. HannanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bromfield v. CochranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Manatee County State Bank v. Bruen-Fisher Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. First National Bank v. Bruen-Fisher Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Scully v. Denver National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Updike v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API