Legal Opinion

Weddington v. Boshamer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1953No. 387PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

We think it is clear from the evidence adduced in the trial below that the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant for the purchase and sale of the knitting machines in question was intended to constitute a cash transaction, subject only to the confirmation of the defendant’s bid at the bankruptcy sale. Plaintiff’s own testimony supports this view, and when the defendant ascertained that the plaintiff’s check given in payment for these machines was worthless, he had the right to rescind the sale.

It is the settled law in this jurisdiction that where personal property is sold for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Dewey Bros. v. MargolisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Parker v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Davidson v. Diamond Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Bryant v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Carrow v. WestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Central National Bank of Richmond v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API