Legal Opinion

People v. Sally

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1993No. B057290PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J. *

The People appeal following the defendants’ successful motion to set aside the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995. The motion was granted on the grounds that multiple hearsay evidence introduced by the People through a police officer’s testimony at the preliminary hearing was inadmissible under section 872, subdivision (b) (enacted as a part of Prop. 115, an initiative measure adopted June 5, 1990) 2 and, consequently, there was insufficient evidence to justify the magistrate’s order holding the defendants to answer. Although we find that the multiple hearsay…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Whitman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. State v. C.D.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. RAYYIS v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API