Legal Opinion
People v. Jimenez
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1995No. G015942PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALLIN, J.
David Duran Jimenez was charged with failing to appear on a felony charge under Penal Code section 1320.5, 1 and the trial court dismissed the action under section 995. The district attorney appeals, contending it presented sufficient evidence to justify a trial of the matter. We reverse.
Jimenez was convicted on felony drug charges and we affirmed. After the remittitur issued, the district attorney had the matter calendared in the superior court. He sent a letter to Jimenez’s lawyer, telling him of the September 4, 1991, court date and asking him to secure Jimenez’s presence.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. Superior Court (Jurado)California Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. North Beach Bonding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. Classified Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Safety National Casualty Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. North River Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- P. v. Continental Heritage Ins. Co. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.