Legal Opinion

RAYYIS v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 2005No. B181214PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COOPER, P. J.

Like most American jurisdictions, California adheres to the “corpus delicti” rule, under which the corpus delicti—essentially, the fact that a crime has been committed—cannot be proved based solely on extrajudicial statements of the defendant. (People v. Alvarez (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1161, 1169, 1173 [119 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 46 P.3d 372] (Alvarez).) Over the years, courts have consistently applied this rule not only to the actual trial of a defendant, but also to the preliminary hearing where it must be determined if sufficient evidence has been presented to hold the defendant to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. Superior Court (Jurado)California Court of Appeal · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. People v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. PLENGSANGTIPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Barrera v. Apple American Group LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Munoz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API