Legal Opinion
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Haik
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 2020No. Case No. 20190091PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter
2020 UT 29
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SALT LAKE & SANDY, Respondents, v. MARK C. HAIK and PEARL RATY, as Trustee of the Pearl Raty Trust, Petitioners. No. 20190091 Heard January 15, 2020 Filed May 18, 2020 On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals Third District, Salt Lake The Honorable Andrew H. Stone No. 140900915 Attorneys: Shawn E. Draney, Scott H. Martin, Danica N. Cepernich, Salt Lake City, for respondents Paul R. Haik, Eden…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Haik v. Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RandolphUtah Supreme Court · 2022
- UDOT v. Boggess-Draper CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Williamson v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Boldt v. American Fork CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Friends of Great Salt Lake v. UDEQCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023