Legal Opinion

Albertson v. Warner

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1943No. Civ. No. 6947Published

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment for defendants after the sustaining of demurrers to plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend.

Said complaint was in four counts. In the first, plaintiff alleged that he was, and is, a duly licensed real estate broker; that the defendants Warner, husband and wife, were the record owners of certain parcels of land in Stanislaus County, “particularly described in the mineral lease dated June 16, 1939, between Tular E. Warner and Mabel Warner as lessors, and Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields as lessee, a copy of which is hereto attached and marked Exhibit A,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. McCarthy v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API