Johnson v. Lamping
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Tenth Judicial District, Sierra County. The defendant had judgment in the Court below, and plaintiff appealed. The other facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, J. :
This is an action by an attaching creditor against a garnishee. The case comes here upon the judgment roll, and the only question is whether the' defendant was indebted to the debtors of the plaintiff at the time the attachment was served upon him, within the meaning of the one hundred and twenty-sixth section of the Practice Act.
The respondent makes certain points as to whether the debtors of the plaintiff are the same as the creditors of the defendant, which we pass without further notice. We assume, for the purposes of our judgment, that the debtors of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Lewis v. Dubose & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- P. A. Lamping & Co. v. HyattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Reynolds v. HosmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Mortimer v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Martin v. Victor Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1885
- Stoeckel v. RussellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.