Legal Opinion

Martin v. Victor Mill & Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1885No. 1209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for “ restoration of rights.”

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Hawley, J.:—

Upon appeal from the district court, the judgment in this case in favor of respondent waá modified by deducting therefrom the sum of seventy dollars. (Martin v. Victor M. & M. Co., ante. Appellant, in taking the appeal, gave no bond to stay *198proceedings under the judgment. Execution was regularly issued upon the judgment, and the Victor mine, the property of appellant, was levied upon and sold under and by virtue of said execution. Respondent became the purchaser of the property at the execution sale; and the time for redemption having expired, he has received a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Gray v. BrignardelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Reynolds v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Gott v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  5. Reynolds v. HosmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Jaksich v. GuistiNevada Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API