Legal Opinion
Collett v. Bither
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 19, 1970PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Justice.
In preparation for trial of his action charging the defendant with the alienation of his wife’s affections, plaintiff sought under Rule 33, M.R.C.P., answers to 19 interrogatories. Defendant’s timely objections thereto on the ground of constitutional privilege against self-incrimination were heard in the Superior Court and the defendant was ordered to answer questions numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 14, 17, 18 and 19 but excused from answering the others. Aggrieved in part by the Court’s decree, defendant under Rule 72(c), M.R.C.P., made a motion to the Court below for the report…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Swanson v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Application of FeingoldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- State v. VickersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Churchill v. S. A. D. 49 Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.