Legal Opinion

Application of Feingold

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 27, 1972PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Chief Justice.

On May 15, 1969 the Board of Examiners for the Examination of Applicants for Admission to the Bar (Board of Bar Examiners), after investigation, found and certified under 4 M.R.S.A., §§ 802, 803 that Alfred Feingold is a person of good moral character and that he is fit to practice law within the State of Maine without examination as to learning in the law. This certificate was issued for presentation to the Supreme Judicial Court as a part of the documentary proof required to be furnished in said Court under Section 802 in support of a motion for admission to practice…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Solomon Feldman, Jr. v. State Board of Law ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Paradis v. Webber HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Quelch v. DaughertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Board of Com'rs of the Alabama State Bar v. State Ex Rel. BaxleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API