Legal Opinion

Violette v. Shoup

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1993No. A055461PublishedCited by 28 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs Rod and Helene Violette appeal from a judgment of the San Mateo County Superior Court dismissing their action against defendants Richard L. Shoup and ManEquity, Inc., following the court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs contend the court erred in granting summary judgment. We shall affirm.

Statement of Facts

This action arose from the failure of plaintiffs’ investment in a wind energy tax shelter, Eagle Wind Partnerships, Ltd. (Eagle Wind). Rod Violette, a commercial airline pilot, had for many years engaged in a variety of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. GAB Business Services, Inc. v. Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Nak Sealing Technologies Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API