Legal Opinion
Lerman v. Levine
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 10, 1988No. 5881PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendants, Jack and Tobey Levine,1 husband and wife, appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for reformation of a deed and for partition and sale of real estate. The defendants counterclaimed seeking contribution from the plaintiff for property-related expenses. The defendants claim the trial court erred (1) in reforming the deed, (2) in ordering partition, (3) in refusing to order reimbursement for various payments made by the defendants, and (4) in ordering that the plaintiff be paid one half of the mortgage payoff upon sale, in addition to one half of the net proceeds…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Damora v. Christ-JanerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nichols v. WarrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Misiurka v. Maple Hill Farms, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Remax Right Choice v. AryehConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Germain v. Kaczorowski (In Re Kaczorowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Culhane v. CulhaneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.