Legal Opinion

Payton v. Monsanto Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 2001No. 1990918PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the timeliness of claims alleging that the Monsanto Company and its agents had polluted Lay Lake. Ben L. Payton, Thomas R. Edwards, and Cliassa Edwards (all hereinafter referred to as "Payton"), on behalf of themselves and a putative class of persons similarly situated, sued Monsanto, Blake Hamilton,1 and a number of fictitiously named parties (all hereinafter referred to as "Monsanto") on July 15, 1997, alleging that Monsanto and the other defendants are liable for money damages, based on theories of negligence; wantonness; breach of a duty to warn of the inherent dangers…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Dgb, LLC v. Michael HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Labauve v. Olin Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005
  4. McKenzie v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. DiBiasi v. Joe Wheeler Elec. Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API