National Cash Register Co. v. Haak
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaeth, J.,
This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s motion to take off a compulsory nonsuit. In reviewing the record in such a case we must give appellant the benefit of all favorable evidence and reasonable inferences of fact. Shirley v. Clark, 441 Pa. 508, 271 A.2d 868 (1970) ; Murray v. Siegal, 413 Pa. 23, 195 A.2d 790 (1963). So viewed, the evidence is as follows.
In April of 1966, appellant, a manufacturing corporation, and appellees, a partnership of professional architects, entered into a contract by which appellees agreed *565to provide architectural services for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abbott v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Powell v. RisserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Bloomsburg Mills, Inc. v. Sordoni Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Robinson v. WirtsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Lentino v. Fringe Employee Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Rosos Litho Supply Corp. v. HansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Incus, Verlin, Hahn, Reich & Goldstein Professional Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.