Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Incus, Verlin, Hahn, Reich & Goldstein Professional Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
This action arises out of the exclusion of a creditor from the distribution of a bankrupt estate. The creditor has sued the law firm that was counsel to the creditors’ committee of a class of creditors of which plaintiff was a member. Defendants seek summary judgment on the grounds that no attorney-client relationship existed between them and plaintiff and that plaintiff’s own negligence exceeded that of defendants’, if any. Plaintiff seeks summary judgment, in essence, as to defendants’ liability.
The operative facts as to which no dispute exists are as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In the Matter of Arlan's Department Stores, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Brown v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- In The Matter Of The Bohack CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Spm Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- In Re: First Merchants Acceptance Corporation, Debtor v. J. C. Bradford & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- In Re Consupak, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Hansen, Jones & Leta, P.C. v. SegalDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
- Matter of Oliver's Stores, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.