Legal Opinion
Heimbach v. State
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Irving A. Green, J.
In a class action brought pursuant to CPLR article 9 for a declaratory judgment (CPLR 3001), the plaintiffs now move for summary judgment in their favor upon the third cause of action set forth in their verified complaint, to wit, that chapter 485 of the Laws of 1981 of the State of New York was not a lawfully enacted law and, consequently, is without effect upon the plaintiffs. The first two causes of action set forth in such complaint seek to raise issues with respect to the constitutionality of said law.
Chapter 485 of the Laws of 1981 increases by one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- The People v. . the Supervisors of ChenangoNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Franklin National Bank of Long Island v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Triboro Coach Corp.v. New York State Labor Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Anderson v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heimbach v. ChuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Heimbach v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Louis Heimbach, As County Executive Of Orange County v. Roderick ChuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984