Legal Opinion
Heimbach v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 18, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Chapter 485 of the Laws of 19811 (Senate Bill 1905; Assembly Bill 9059) increases by one quarter of 1% the sales and compensating use tax of the State within the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District (MCTD), a 12-county area served by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). Orange and Suffolk Counties are included in the MCTD (Public Authorities Law, § 1262).
As recorded in the Journal of the Senate, Senate Bill 1905 was passed by that body with the minimum number2 of affirmative votes required by the State Constitution (NY Const, art III, § 14). The voting…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People Ex Rel. Hatch v. . ReardonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Heimbach v. ChuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Board of Education of Glen Cove City School District v. Nassau CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Bivona v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Louis Heimbach, As County Executive Of Orange County v. Roderick ChuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984