Grant v. Auvil
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Plaintiff is entitled to recover upon his first cause of action if the contract upon which he sues is evidenced by “some note or memorandum in writing of the contract or sale . . . signed by the party to be charged.” Rem. Rev. Stat., § 5836-4(1).
It is admitted that the subject matter of the transaction exceeded fifty dollars in value; that no part of the goods had been accepted, or actually received; that nothing had been given in earnest to bind the contract; and that part payment had not been made. The initial memorandum upon which plaintiff relies is as follows:
“Grant’s Poultry Farms
“Clinto…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Western Metals Co v. Hartman Ingot Metal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Brewster Cooperative Growers v. Brewster Orchards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- Jones-Scott Co. v. Ellensburg Milling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Baillargeon, Winslow & Co. v. WestenfeldWashington Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jones v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Jones v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Cahn v. Foster & Marshall, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Alaska Independent Fishermen's Marketing Ass'n v. New England Fish Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Platts v. ArneyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.