Legal Opinion

Moe v. Wise

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 19, 1999No. 20050-3-II, 20837-7-IIPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Howard Moe appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his defamation action against defendant Arnold Robbins, the attorney for a business in Chapter 11. The trial court held that the “common interest” qualified privilege protected Robbins’s allegedly defamatory communication about Moe’s role in the business’s financial losses. The trial court further found no abuse of that privilege. Holding that a Chapter 11 bankruptcy debtor and its creditors share a common interest in determining the cause of the subject business’s financial failure, we uphold the ruling regarding privilege and affirm the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wood v. Battle Ground School Dist.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Wood v. Battle Ground School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Harris v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Harris v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API